Havalimanlarının Dili: 4 Havalimanı Web Sitesi Üzerinden Göstergebilimsel Bir Çözümleme

Author :  

Year-Number: 2022-Cilt:3 Sayı:2
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2022-12-14 12:50:25.0
Language : Türkçe
Konu : Turizm
Number of pages: 83-99
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Literatürde havalimanına yönelik yer aşinalığı, havalimanında yolcuların tüketim davranışları, havalimanlarına yönelik marka algısı, küreselleşme kapsamında havalimanlarının atmosferiği gibi konular ele alınmıştır. Mevcut çalışma ise havalimanlarının mekânsal organizasyonları ile ilgilenmektedir. Bu doğrultuda çalışmada, Avrupa’nın En İyi Havalimanı Ödülü’nü almış havalimanları web siteleri üzerinden mekânsal göstergeleri bağlamında incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın bu şekilde kurgulanmasında, Türkiye’nin belli başlı uluslararası havalimanlarından biri olan ve 2009 yılında Havalimanı Uluslararası Komisyonu (Airport Council International Europe) tarafından kendisine verilen Avrupa En İyi Havalimanı Ödülü’nü alan Esenboğa Havalimanı’nın enzer statüdeki havalimanlarıyla göstergeleri bağlamında karşılaştırılması ve rekabet potansiyeli bağlamında gereken önerilerin sunulması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma bulguları arasında havalimanları arasındaki en büyük gösterge farklılıklarının bir mekân olarak konumlanma ve yolcu psikolojisini etkileme yönü üzerinde olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu doğrultuda her bir havalimanı için faydalı olabilecek ve konuyla ilgili çalışmayı düşünen araştırmacılara yol gösterebilecek öneriler geliştirilmiştir. 

Keywords

Abstract

In the literature, subjects such as place familiarity with the airport, consumption behaviors of passengers at the airport, brand perception towards airports, and the atmosphere of airports within the scope of globalization have been discussed. The present study is concerned with the spatial organization of airports. In this direction, in the study, the airports that received the Best Airport Award in Europe were examined in the context of their spatial semotics through their websites. In designing the study in this way, it has intented to be presented the comparison of airports and one of Turkey's major international airports -Esenboğa Airport- that received the European Best Airport Award given to it by the Airport Council International Europe in 2009, with airports with similar status in terms of their semiotics have compared and the suggestions required in the context of competition potential intended to be presented. Among the findings of the study, it was revealed that the biggest semiotics differences between airports are on positioning as a place and the way of influencing passenger psychology. In this direction, suggestions have been developed that can be useful for each airport and guide the researchers who are considering working on the subject.

Keywords


  • Abranches, M. (2013). When People Stay and Things Make Their Way: Airports, Mobilities and Materialities of a Transnational Landscape. Mobilities, 8(4), 506–527.

  • Adey, P. (2006). If Mobility is Everything Then it is Nothing: Towards a Relational Politics of (Im)mobilities. Mobilities, 1(1), 75–94.

  • Adey, P. (2007). May I Have Your Attention: Airport Geographies of Spectatorship, Position, and (im)Mobility. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(3), 515–536.

  • Adey, P. (2008a). Mobilities and Modulations: The Airport as a Difference Machine, Mark B. Salter (Ed.) Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (ss. 145-161).

  • Adey, P. (2008b). Airports, Mobility and The Calculative Architecture of Affective Control. Geoforum, 39(1), 438–451.

  • Auge, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodern, Londra: Verso.

  • Björkvall, A., Van Meerbergen, S., and Westberg, G. (2020). Feeling Safe while Being Surveilled: The Spatial Semiotics of Affect at International Airports. Social Semiotics, 1–23.

  • Cammozzo, A. (2014). Airports as an encoding/decoding device: a semiotic analysis of a designed space, 5th STS Italia Conference A Matter of Design: Making Society through Science and Technology Milan , 12–14 Haziran 2014.

  • Castillo-Manzano, J. I., López-Valpuesta, L., ve Sánchez-Braza, A. (2018). When the Mall is in the Airport: Measuring the Effect of the Airport Mall on Passengers Consumer Behavior. Journal of Air Transport Management, 72, 32–38.

  • Ceccato, V., ve Masci, S. (2017). Airport Environment and Passengers’ Satisfaction with Safety. Journal of Applied Security Research, 12(3), 356–373.

  • Cidell, J. (2006). Air Transportation, Airports, and the Discourses and Practices of Globalization. Urban Geography, 27(7), 651–663.

  • Colomer, L. (2018). Feeling Like at Home in Airports: Experiences, Memories and Affects of Placeness among Third Culture Kids. Applied Mobilities, 1–16.

  • Diesendruck, G., Hall, D. G., ve Graham, S. A. (2006). Children’s Use of Syntactic and Pragmatic Knowledge in the Interpretation of Novel Adjectives. Child Development, 77(1), 16–30.

  • Elliott, A., ve Radford, D. (2015). Terminal Experimentation: The Transformation of Experiences, Events and Escapes at Global Airports. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33(6), 1063–1079.

  • Ellis, D. G. (1992). Syntactic and Pragmatic Codes in Communication. Communication Theory, 2(1), 1–23.

  • Fuller, G. (2002). The Arrow--Directional Semiotics: Wayfinding in Transit. Social Semiotics, 12(3), 231–244.

  • Fuller, G. (2008). Welcome to Windows 2.1: Motion Aesthetics at the Airport, Mark B. Salter (Ed.) Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (ss. 161-175).

  • Gitto, S., ve Mancuso, P. (2019). Brand Perceptions of Airports Using Social Networks. Journal of Air Transport Management, 75, 153–163.

  • Griggs, S., ve Howarth, D. (2017). Discourse, Policy and the Environment: Hegemony, Statements and the Analysis of U.K. Airport Expansion. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1–15.

  • Gurr, C. A. (1999). Effective Diagrammatic Communication: Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Issues. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 10(4), 317–342.

  • Harvey, D. (2006). Spaces of Global Capitalism: Towards A Theory of Uneven Geographical Development, Londra, New York: Verso.

  • Huang, W.-J., Xiao, H., ve Wang, S. (2018). Airports as Liminal Space. Annals of Tourism Research, 70, 1–13.

  • Jones, D. R., ve Pitfield, D. E. (2007). The Effectiveness of Conceptual Airport Terminal Designs. Transportation Planning and Technology, 30(5), 521–543.

  • Jung, H.-J., ve Shin, Y.-K. (2016). Spatial Characteristics of the Infrastructure Integrated with Architectural Space Focused on International Hub Airport. Sustainable Cities and Society, 27, 203–209.

  • Kellerman, A. (2008). International Airports: Passengers in an Environment of Authorities. Mobilities, 3(1), 161– 178.

  • Knox, H., O’Doherty, D., Vurdubakis, T., ve Westrup, C. (2008). Enacting Airports: Space, Movement and Modes of Ordering. Organization, 15(6), 869–888.

  • Littman, D. M. (2020). Third Place Theory and Social Work: Considering Collapsed Places. Journal of Social Work, 146801732094944. doi:10.1177/1468017320949445

  • Lloyd, J. (2003). Airport Technology, Travel, and Consumption. Space & Culture, 6(2), 93-109.

  • Moon, H., Yoon, H. J., ve Han, H. (2016). The Effect of Airport Atmospherics on Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions: Testing the Moderating Role of Perceived Safety. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 34(6), 749–763.

  • Mumayiz, S. A. (1989). Development of Airport Terminal Design Concepts—A New Perspective. Transportation Planning and Technology, 13(4), 303–320.

  • Pearson, J. S. (2018). Choreographing the Airport: Field Notes from the Transit Spaces of Global Mobility, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Pütz, O. (2011). From Non-Places to Non-Events. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 41(2), 154–188.

  • Sharma, S. (2009). Baring Life And Lifestyle in The Non-Place. Cultural Studies, 23(1), 129–148.

  • Samuel, A. J., White, G.R.T., Peattie, K. ve Thomas, R. (2021). Social Enterprise Places: A Place-Based Initiative Facilitating Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Constructions of Legitimacy. Journal of Macromarketing, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467211040765

  • Thurlow, C., ve Aiello, G. (2007). National Pride, Global Capital: A Social Semiotic Analysis of Transnational Visual Branding in the Airline Industry. Visual Communication, 6(3), 305–344.

  • Urry, J., Elliott, A., Radford, D., ve Pitt, N. (2016). Globalisations Utopia? On Airport Atmospherics. Emotion, Space and Society, 19, 13–20.

  • www.airport-valencia.com, Erişim Adresi: https://www.airport-valencia.com/, Erişim Tarihi: 14.12.2022

  • www.esenbogaarport.com, Erişim Adresi: https://esenbogaairport.com/, Erişim Tarihi: 14.12.2022

  • www.maltairport.com, Erişim Adresi: https://www.maltairport.com/, Erişim Tarihi: 14.12.2022

  • Wattanacharoensil, W., Schuckert, M., ve Graham, A. (2015). An Airport Experience Framework from a Tourism Perspective. Transport Reviews, 36(3), 318–340.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics